17th Century Ways of Telling

As I wandered around the Rembrandt exhibition at the National Gallery recently, I got thinking about representations of the social and how what I was seeing was a 17th century way of telling, and just as valid as our modern ways. I wouldn’t ascribe this point to his religious works, but to his portraits of everyday people and scenes. It’s from paintings such as Rembrandt’s that we are able to see how people dressed, in this case the wealthy merchant class and upper classes, during the latter half of the 17th century, their body language, how they held themselves and interacted with each other. Experts in medicine and art history are even able to determine if the sitter in a portrait had a particular ailment and if so, which disease/illness they had.

So I think we can safely say that painting is a valid way of telling.

De Staalmeesters/The Syndics of the Drapers' Guild. 1662 Rembrandt http://www.rembrandthuis.nl/media/images/staalmeesters.jpeg

De Staalmeesters/The Syndics of the Drapers’ Guild. 1662
Rembrandt
http://www.rembrandthuis.nl/media/images/staalmeesters.jpeg

The exhibition catalogue says this about Rembrandt:

He was captivated by life’s peculiarities – its randomness and its defects, its anomalies and its ordinariness – and considered it an artist’s responsibility to record images and events without preconceptions of beauty or ugliness. A hanged women, a scruffy landscape or an exotic beast were equally deserving of his scrutiny. This attitude was in complete opposition to the classically orientated art theory of the day, which held that only beauty and perfection were worthy of an artist’s notice. Rembrandt’s insistence on truth to nature eventually resulted in him being branded an idiosyncratic ‘art heretic by critics and theorists during his lifetime and immediately after his death.

(National Gallery)

On a personal note Rembrandt remains one of my earliest memories of appreciating art, long before I even thought of picking up a camera.

His work is visceral, earthy and moving. Nearly 350 years after his death his paintings are still able to speak to us, the people captured within his frame still crackle with energy and the paintings glow with the vibrancy of his brushstrokes.

One of the things that struck me long before I knew what perspective was or the the rule of thirds, or the golden ratio, was how he placed the figures in his paintings.

Each one perfectly balanced.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s